Sponsored offer for you:

Monday, May 21, 2012

RE: [RWA-Mascot:628] Re: Update on Electricity Issue in Mahagun Mascot

The cut is for the whole township

 

From: mascotrwa@googlegroups.com [mailto:mascotrwa@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Debashis Khanrah
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2012 1:59 PM
To: mascotrwa@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [RWA-Mascot:627] Re: Update on Electricity Issue in Mahagun Mascot

 

Dear Friends,

Please clarify one thing, only Mahagun had done the same, or other builders in CR had also done the same. As One of my friend is staying in Assotech, in their society also, power was not there for the whole night.

With Regards
-Debashis
Verona - 1629

On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Gaurav Gupta <gauravdream@gmail.com> wrote:

I would like to suggest that we should cast this news in Print and Electronic Media too, this will help two ways –

 

1. New buyer will be more cautious, directly related with Builder’ interest not only for this project but also for other projects too. So it will create the pressure.

2.Who have already purchased the flat with Mahagun and not following the any email group, they will also ask for the clarification and can/will hold the payment too.

    

See if it will helpful to us.

 

Best Regards,

Gaurav

 

On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Aijaz Ahmed <ahmedaijaz1@gmail.com> wrote:

I completely agree with Gaurav.

 

Rather than cornering the builder on all the points simultaneously and getting into a conflict situation, it would make sense if we focus on raising the bar on performance factors.

The power scenario is an immediate concern and should be treated on priority. Getting power through private players is not that bad provided we are entitled to all the inherent benefits. We should strive for a proper, well published rostering plan. Any deviation to that plan (say > 10%) should attract penalty to the service provider - CCPCL. 

Let CCPCL reimburse the charges for running and maintaining the DG Sets for our society during such beak down.

 

-Aijaz

919 - Milano

 

On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Gyani <gyanendra.dwivedi@gmail.com> wrote:

Now, I am getting a bit of picture................... Here is more detail of about Rathi.

---------------------------------

Address of rathi Steel and Power

 

 

A -3, Industrial Area No. 1, South of G.T. Road 

Ghaziabad - 201009

Uttar Pradesh - India

Phone : 2840346-350

Fax : 2840352/284035

 

This place is just across the road near Dundahera. Pin code is also of Dundahera.

 

 

History of Rathi Steel and Power

 2008 -Company name has been changed from Rathi Udyog Ltd to Rathi Steel &  Power Ltd

 

=========================================

It means, just to attach itself to CRPCL business; the company changed its name in 2008 [around the same time, crossing started]

Now Crossing is RTM [Ready-to-move] stage, we must force Mahagun to take a direct connection from UPPCL... We have paid EEC for that and it was all part of agreement...

 

Even though they route the electricity through private player, it should not be charged more than the government rate... BECAUSE the private player is not a electricity supplier.. they are just routing the UPPCL electric.

 

 

Best Regards,

Gyanendra Dwivedi
Gyanendra.Dwivedi@gmail.com

On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Gaurav Malik <mailgauravmalik@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi All,

 

Just a thought from my side. Maybe we can discuss on this in detail in the GBM.

 

Till the time we get power from government, we need to ask Crossings to rework the contract with the current power provided (Power company). There should be penalty clauses imposed on the supplier based on the number of hours of outage / day.

 

The private company is providing a service in terms of providing electricity. Hence in my view they should be legally bounded by strict performance rules. If they do not give adequate supply the contract should impose penalty on them.

 



 

On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Gyani <gyanendra.dwivedi@gmail.com> wrote:

I would like to suggest that if we are on private electricity supply; we must put a pressure on Mahagun to get UPPCL connection directly.

 

Benefits:

1. We will not be mercy of any 3rd party to get the power supply. All load shedding will be directly from government, which is currently 8 hours even in remote area of Jhansi.

 

2. The current charges of INR 65/KW/Month will be reduced to INR 40/KW/Month....

 

3. The current charges of INR 3.80 per unit will be reduced to INR 3.20... 

 

Its absolutely cheating from Whole Crossing builder lobby... they and Rathi Power are making handsome money out of  electricity... [A side business].

 

Further, When google; I could not find any "Rathi Power" ... rather it is "Rathi Steel and Power Ltd" ... If it is the company.. the we are absolutely being cheated as this company do not have any business in power production.

 

It means.. We are being charged for electricity, which is our basic rights.... Need to dig up more on this nexus.


Best Regards,
Gyanendra Dwivedi
Gyanendra.Dwivedi@gmail.com



On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 11:03 AM, RAJ KUMAR RAJU <rajubanka@gmail.com> wrote:

Date: 21th May 2012

 

Electricity Issue in Mahagun Mascot

 

Dear Valued Resident,

 

This is just to keep you informed that MMRWA called an urgent Executive Body Meeting (EBM) meeting last night at 9 PM to discuss on the current electricity issue in the entire township. As you all are aware that we are on DG and there will be no main power supply in the society till 22nd May 2012 and have forced to pay hefty amount as recharge coupon for electricity bill.

 

During the discussion, we suddenly called Mr. S. C. Sharma (AVP-Commercial, Mahagun India Pvt. Ltd.) and Mr. Mayank Aggarwal (Director, CSK Facility Management Pvt. Ltd.) and informed them that the resident are not happy with the current power distribution and we all are very panic as of now. They said that the current issue is not from Mahagun’s end, it is from Crossings Republik Power Corporation Ltd. (CRPCL) as the CT/PT devise has some fault and they are working to resolve these issues ASAP.

 

After this call, MMRWA decided to visit the CRPCL to know the exact situation and a group of 35 people from our society visited there and we came to know that there is no UPPCL power supply within the society and the entire Crossings Republik is running on private power supply (so called Rathi Power Industries). This is a very serious concern. Then, I called Mr. Pandey (Coordinator-CRPCL) and Mr. S. C. Sharma (GM-CRPCL) but they said that they are not answerable for any question as they already informed the individual societies/builders that the power distribution will be disturbed for next 48 hours.

 

The question is – Till how long this will continue we don't know. We, as a resident can't bear the hefty electricity bill for longer period. It is our right to have government power supply as we have paid all the statutory amounts/dues while buying the apartment and at the time of registration. The township is also approved by GDA under the U.P.Township Scheme. Therefore we can't be the victim for the major Electricity Supply issue. Mahagun had assured and committed to provide the basic amenities at the time of booking and at the time possession were not being provided by the builders even after many month of the possession which is their core responsibility under the agreement signed with them.

 

Now, MMRWA is going to escalate the subject issue to the Builder – Mahagun India Pvt. Ltd. so that they can escalate it to the Crossings Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. i.e. the entity responsible for the development of the entire township to understand the subject and to apprise the status of the development of power station with the sufficient power supply for the township otherwise we will proceed for the legal action/Consumer Forum for the same as we are feeling that we have been cheated by the builder.

 

Please let me know if you have any question.

 

-- 

Thanks & Regards,

 

Raj Kumar Raju

Cell# 9811922379

President, MMRWA

Crossings Republik Township

NH-24, Ghaziabad (U.P.)

 

 

 

 

 

 



The information contained in this message may be confidential and legally protected under applicable law. The message is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, forwarding, dissemination, or reproduction of this message is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by return e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.

No comments:

Post a Comment